— GPI Niche Report · 2026-Q2 · May 2026

RingCentral splits by persona cohorts with a 44-point gap — Zoom leads at 91 GPI · Video Conferencing · 15 May 2026

Editorial summary based on observed model outputs and daily index facts.

91
— Leader's GPI
Zoom holds 91 GPI, unchanged from 91 vs 4 May 2026.
0
— Biggest mover
Zoom climbed from 91 to 91, the largest gain in this snapshot.
0
— Biggest faller
Zoom moved from 91 to 91, the weakest delta among current top 10.
40 brands
— Coverage
40 brands compared across 180 prompt-runs, baseline 4 May 2026.

Top 10 Video Conferencing brands by GPI

Snapshot: 15 May 2026 · Period: 2026-Q2 · Niche: Video Conferencing · Comparison baseline: 4 May 2026.

0255075100
1
Zoom
GLB ELITE
91
91
→ 0
2
Microsoft Teams
GLB EXCELLENCE
88
88
→ 0
3
Google Meet
GLB EXCELLENCE
86
86
→ 0
4
Cisco Webex
GLB EXCELLENCE
83
83
→ 0
5
BlueJeans
GLB VERIFIED
63
63
→ 0
6
Skype
GLB VERIFIED
60
60
→ 0
7
Jitsi
GLB VERIFIED
53
53
→ 0
8
RingCentral
GLB VERIFIED
53
53
→ 0
9
Lifesize
GLB VERIFIED
52
52
→ 0
10
GoTo Meeting
GLB VERIFIED
51
51
→ 0

What changed since yesterday

Quick signal scan versus 4 May 2026: 0 brands moved up and 0 moved down in today’s top set.

Top moversDelta GPI
Zoom 0
Microsoft Teams 0
Google Meet 0

One findings,
thirty seconds.

1. RingCentral splits by persona cohorts with a 44-point gap → PERSONA_SPLIT

Trust & Coverage

Coverage this issue
Prompts run180
Brands detected40
MarketsUS, EU
Data freshness15 May 2026
Confidence in ranking changes
High 0 Medium 0 Low 0
Interpretation rule

Only treat moves >5 GPI with Medium+ confidence as strategic signal.

Top ranking movesDelta GPIEvidence pointsConfidence
No non-zero ranking moves in this issue.

Visibility by AI model

Top 5 brands split by model-level visibility in this issue. Use this to see where a brand is strong, weak, or absent across assistant ecosystems.

Top brandsChatGPTGeminiPerplexityClaudeGoogle AI OverviewGrok
Zoom
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
0%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
Microsoft Teams
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
0%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
Google Meet
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
0%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
Cisco Webex
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
0%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
BlueJeans
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
100%
· n=1
0%
· n=1
100%
· n=1

Insights this quarter

PERSONA_SPLIT · auto trigger

RingCentral splits by persona cohorts with a 44-point gap

Shopping persona scores 44 GPI while Q&A persona scores 0.

RingCentral is framed differently across personas: Shopping persona at 44 GPI versus Q&A persona at 0 GPI.

Why it matters: Signals potential audience framing bias across model personas.

Spread: 44 ptsShopping persona vs Q&A personan=180

Zoom vs RingCentral

This issue is generated from the index pipeline. Scores represent AI visibility and framing in Video Conferencing recommendations across leading language models.

Zoom
91
→ 0
RingCentral
53
→ 0
# Brand Region Trend vs 4 May 2026 GPI Δ vs 4 May 2026
1
Zoom
ELITE
GLB 91 → 91 91 → 0
2
Microsoft Teams
EXCELLENCE
GLB 88 → 88 88 → 0
3
Google Meet
EXCELLENCE
GLB 86 → 86 86 → 0
4
Cisco Webex
EXCELLENCE
GLB 83 → 83 83 → 0
5
BlueJeans
VERIFIED
GLB 63 → 63 63 → 0
6
Skype
VERIFIED
GLB 60 → 60 60 → 0
7
Jitsi
VERIFIED
GLB 53 → 53 53 → 0
8
RingCentral
VERIFIED
GLB 53 → 53 53 → 0
9
Lifesize
VERIFIED
GLB 52 → 52 52 → 0
10
GoTo Meeting
VERIFIED
GLB 51 → 51 51 → 0

Updated 15 May 2026, 11:35 UTC. This report is published by Getllmspy GPI index.

Methodology & caveats

GPI measures AI visibility and framing in model answers, not sales or market share forecasts. This issue is generated from index layers (prompts, measurements, aggregates, narrative, reports) with deterministic daily runs.

No synthetic brands or synthetic scores are injected. If the quarter lacks coverage, we show fewer rows and mark insufficiency explicitly.

Data updates timeline

Each bar shows how many measurements were refreshed on that date. Last data update: 15 May 2026.

Report refreshed: 15 May 2026 (report rebuilt from latest available measurements).

15 May 2026
180
Prompts used in this issue (8)

Prompt pack extracted from completed checks included in this daily slice.

#Prompt text
1Name up to 10 brands, companies, or services that **directly** operate in the «Video Conferencing» niche in in global markets (not adjacent “marketing in general”). Briefly justify the order. Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.
2Which **direct** providers of the «Video Conferencing» service/product do you most often name for users in in global markets? Do not mix in generic SEO/SMM tools unless they explicitly sell this niche. Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.
3Which companies **explicitly position** as «Video Conferencing» players and are considered strong in in global markets? Exclude vendors that are only “in digital marketing” without this exact offering. Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.
4Who gets criticized most in «Video Conferencing» in in global markets and for what? In the brand list, include only those criticized as providers of this niche—not any random SEO shop. Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.
5If you recommended the «Video Conferencing» offering to a friend in in global markets, who would you name first among **direct** players? Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.
6Which **specialized** «Video Conferencing» services (not generic course platforms or full-service agencies without this explicit niche) show up most in discussions in in global markets? Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.
7Among **core** «Video Conferencing» players in in global markets, who signals premium pricing vs affordability? Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.
8Which **core** «Video Conferencing» companies in in global markets are mentioned more often in a positive light lately? Do not pad the list with adjacent brands. Important: in the structured brand list, include only players that directly match the niche wording (they clearly sell that service/product). Do not pad with adjacent marketing vendors: generic SEO/SMM agencies, social schedulers, rank trackers, link marketplaces, or training platforms unless they explicitly market this exact niche. If unsure, omit the brand from the structured list and state the caveat in prose only.

FAQ for Video Conferencing

How should executives read this Video Conferencing daily report?

Treat GPI movement above 5 points with medium or high confidence as strategic signal. Smaller shifts are directional and should be monitored over consecutive daily issues against baseline 4 May 2026.

Does this report measure market share?

No. GPI reflects AI recommendation visibility and framing quality across model answers, not revenue or shipment share.

How often is this report refreshed?

Daily pipeline runs rebuild this issue from the latest completed measurements, then publish a dated snapshot for comparison.

How should we use new entrants in decisions?

Treat first-time entrants as provisional until they appear in consecutive issues with medium or high evidence.

Explore other daily reports

Check how AI recommends your brand next.

Run your own visibility snapshot across major LLMs and see where you rank, who wins citations, and what changed week over week. You get a dated, comparable report your leadership team can trust.

Check my brand in AI results Takes about 2-3 minutes · no setup required