Check report for Carapelli from 1 April 2026
How AI models see “Carapelli” — report: 6 models, 8 scenarios each · 1 April 2026 · niche: Premium Olive Oil · Global
Dynamics across runs
13 weekly measurements over ~3 months
Red line: GPI™ by measurement. Gray line: share of voice.
GPI™ climbed from 11 to 31 and share of voice from 4% to 18%—steady visibility gains in AI answers.
GPI™
Share of voice %
18
GPI™ · 1 Apr 2026
Critical (0–34)
Vs previous run
29 +2 pts
Leader — Bertolli
78−60 pts
90-day target (guide)
18 → 35–45
Niche · date
Premium Olive Oil · Global · 1 Apr
GPI™ scale (0–100)
You: 18
Leader (Bertolli): 78
AI visibility
18%
Models that named your brand. Competitor rows use a different metric (name share in answer text).
Avg list position
4.2
Average slot in recommendation lists (1 ≈ first).
Site as AI source
1%
Share of links to your site among sources in answers.
How AI talks about you
40% · 24% · 36%
Positive · neutral · negative on labeled answers.
Key takeaways
Carapelli · GPI™ 18/100
Critical · Coverage & competitors
4 of 6 models mention you — grow the rest. “Bertolli” leads competitor mentions in answers.
4 of 6 models mentioned Carapelli at least once. Still silent this run: ChatGPT, Perplexity. Among answers that name competitors, Bertolli shows up about once every 3—that name is easy for models to recall. Create a “Carapelli vs Bertolli” page with an honest side-by-side. In a niche like “Premium Olive Oil · Global”, spell out price, timelines, materials, or whatever buyers compare head-to-head. Models often cite pages like this for “what should I pick” questions. Prioritize intents where visibility lags: «Лучшие оливковые масла для ежедневной готовки»; «Сравнение премиум-масел»; «Дегустация вслепую» — add or refresh landing sections that answer those prompts directly. Weakest model rows: ChatGPT 0/8 prompts with a mention; Perplexity 0/8 prompts with a mention. Task: rerun after you add niche facts, lists, and citations those models tend to use.
At risk · Website citations
Your site is almost never cited by models.
Citation share is modest (~0.8% of hosts in this run). Improve structured summaries on key pages and add one or two external links worth citing. Pitch mentions on domains models already cite in this run: wikipedia.org, oliveoiltimes.com, bonappetit.com, ratingruneta.ru.
Critical · List position
Avg position 4.2 — often low in recommendation lists.
Average list position 4.2 (among answers where the model assigned a list slot) — Carapelli is often placed in the bottom half of lists, not first. Publish a flagship page titled “Premium Olive Oil · Global — Carapelli” with comparisons, proof (specs, reviews, awards), and the same 5–7 concrete facts so models have reasons to move you up.
Critical · Sentiment
Notable negative tone — fix recurring issues you can prove.
Labeled tone: ~40% pos / ~24% neu / ~36% neg. Task: rewrite FAQs and public specs around the recurring negatives—only where you have proof.
Deep dive — pick a section
Site & next steps
Site clarity: improve “Structured data (schema)” — one consistent company/product story on key pages so assistants repeat the same facts you publish.
Visibility by model
Models that named your brand. Competitor rows use a different metric (name share
Claude👁
100%
8/8 prompts
DeepSeek👁
100%
7/7 prompts
Gemini👁
100%
8/8 prompts
Grok👁
100%
8/8 prompts
ChatGPT🚫
0%
0/8 prompts
Perplexity🚫
0%
0/8 prompts
GPI™ among competitors
Bertolli
78
Filippo Berio
67
Kirkland (Costco)
51
Colavita
44
Carapelli ← you
18
Strong (60+)At risk (35–59)Critical (0–34)
Quotes
Showing 7 of 7 matching filters (8 total in report)
GPT
ChatGPT· PositiveЛучшие оливковые масла для ежедневной готовки…
Carapelli — узнаваемая итальянская марка с устойчивым качеством Extra Virgin.
GPT
ChatGPT· NeutralСравнение премиум-масел…
Среди премиум-сегмента часто называют Bertolli, Filippo Berio и Carapelli — у каждого свой профиль вкуса.
CL
Claude· PositiveКому подойдёт мягкое Extra Virgin без сильной горечи…
Carapelli хорошо заходит тем, кто ищет мягкий фруктовый профиль без агрессивной горечи.
GM
Gemini· NeutralЭтичность и происхождение…
Проверяйте сертификаты происхождения: у Carapelli и Colavita обычно прозрачная цепочка поставок.
PER
Perplexity· NeutralРейтинг по цене и качеству…
Carapelli позиционируется в среднем ценовом сегменте премиум; лидеры по охвату в ответах ИИ — крупные международные бренды.
DS
DeepSeek· PositiveТоп для салатов…
Для лёгких салатов Carapelli Extra Virgin часто рекомендуют из-за сбалансированной кислотности.
GPT
ChatGPT· PositiveДегустация вслепую…
На слепых дегустациях Carapelli нередко попадает в топ-3 среди массового премиум.
Citation sources
top domains · 23
1.
wikipedia.org
14% · 26
2.
oliveoiltimes.com
11% · 19
3.
bonappetit.com
9% · 16
4.
ratingruneta.ru
8% · 12
5.
ashmanov.com
7% · 10
6.
serpstat.com
6% · 9
7.
bbcgoodfood.com
5.5% · 8
8.
searchengines.guru
5% · 7
9.
2gis.ru
4% · 6
10.
yandex.ru
4% · 6
11.
foodandwine.com
3.5% · 5
12.
reddit.com
3.2% · 5
13.
bertolli.com
3% · 11
14.
healthline.com
2.6% · 4
Action plan
0 of 5 doneP1
Coverage & competitors
4 of 6 models mentioned Carapelli at least once. Still silent this run: ChatGPT, Perplexity. Among answers that name competitors, Bertolli shows up about once every 3—that name is easy for models to recall. Create a “Carapelli vs Bertolli” page with an honest side-by-side. In a niche like “Premium Olive Oil · Global”, spell out price, timelines, materials, or whatever buyers compare head-to-head. Models often cite pages like this for “what should I pick” questions. Prioritize intents where visibility lags: «Лучшие оливковые масла для ежедневной готовки»; «Сравнение премиум-масел»; «Дегустация вслепую» — add or refresh landing sections that answer those prompts directly. Weakest model rows: ChatGPT 0/8 prompts with a mention; Perplexity 0/8 prompts with a mention. Task: rerun after you add niche facts, lists, and citations those models tend to use.
+8–14 pts
P2
Website citations
Citation share is modest (~0.8% of hosts in this run). Improve structured summaries on key pages and add one or two external links worth citing. Pitch mentions on domains models already cite in this run: wikipedia.org, oliveoiltimes.com, bonappetit.com, ratingruneta.ru.
+5–10 pts
P1
List position
Average list position 4.2 (among answers where the model assigned a list slot) — Carapelli is often placed in the bottom half of lists, not first. Publish a flagship page titled “Premium Olive Oil · Global — Carapelli” with comparisons, proof (specs, reviews, awards), and the same 5–7 concrete facts so models have reasons to move you up.
+8–14 pts
P1
Sentiment
Labeled tone: ~40% pos / ~24% neu / ~36% neg. Task: rewrite FAQs and public specs around the recurring negatives—only where you have proof.
+8–14 pts
P2
Site & next steps
Site clarity: improve “Structured data (schema)” — one consistent company/product story on key pages so assistants repeat the same facts you publish.
+5–10 pts
Indicative GPI™ range (90d guide)
18 → 35–45
Context:Carapelli · GPI™ 18vs BertolliPremium Olive Oil · Globalwikipedia.org
Messages in this chat: 0 / 10 (per report)
Assistant
Hi — I already know this report’s metrics. Check off a task in the plan or ask below.
Want this every week — on autopilot?
Re-run on a schedule, watch competitors, and get alerts when something moves.
GPI™ historyCompetitorsScheduled runs
View plans →
Cancel anytime.
GPI™ = coverage 35% · citation 30% · position 20% · sentiment 15% (renormalized if a field is missing).
Scores reflect this check run; competitor rows use visibility or mention share where GPI is not stored per brand.